![]() But all in all it was a very positive experience. Also the conversion from 1.5 to 1.6 did not work, so I had to reinstall 1.5 after my computer had received an OS upgrade. Furhtermore, a number of weird things that we had to ignore (e.g., parts of sentences suddenly disappearing from a number of chapter-files - we still do not know how that could have happened). Problems: at times some ERT to fix things that are defined by the LaTeX style of Chapman & Hall. And the result is now to be published by Chapman & Hall in June (google for ISBN 1420065157 if you are interested). I convinced my colleague to become a co-author and we both only used LyX and other open-source software (The Gimp, Inkscape, JabRef, ImageMagick, R, Eclipse, StatET) - well, almost - for the preflight to check for non-CMYK objects I used Acrobat Professional. So, this time around I decided to even try LyX for writing a camera-ready book. If I write a text, I would like to focus on the text. To me it always distracts and hinders the readability. I always liked the concept of LaTeX, but never really liked the idea of mixing commands with text (I am NOT a LaTeX expert!). Initially I thought I was naive to try this. I look forward to using this tool for years to come. Slick type layout strategies in LaTeX are fully handled by the underlying system, and math is handled gracefullyįor a clean, professional look, yet I can focus on the text of my paper and not visually sift through all the codeĪs I write. Just three days before the deadline I understood my mistake and rediscovered LyX.Īlthough citations with the achicago styleĭidn't work, I was able to add LaTeX code myself and get the paper out on-time. Microsoft had no idea what I was talking about, and the M*thType folks were Then Word trashed all the inline formulas and converted them to uneditable images, costing meĪt least a few hours. ![]() I couldn't get inline equations to look right-the spacing was awkward, the baselines didn't Having come back to academia forĪ PhD, I purchased Word and a leading equation editor M*thType, because that's what my fellow students Stint in industry, because everyone in the corporate world uses Word. I remember LyX from the alpha versions over a decade ago. ![]() I would like to thank the LyX team for their wonderful product. I am now using it for study in conjunction with JabRef and have recently figured out how to get Australian English spellcheck and thesaurus working. They could not understand how I could produce such consistent publications! Everyone else in the organisation was using M$ Word and M$ Publisher. I used LyX a long time ago, and have been using it for the last 18 months or so in preparing written teaching materials. In addition to the consistent formatting when required, it handles massive documents with great ease. I understand that LyX is commonly used for academic and mathematical texts - however, I would like to emphasize that LyX is also an incredibly useful tool for novelists. Interface it is a great piece of software. To conclude, I highly recommend LyX to anyone. Minimal version of Latex was packaged with LyX. Yes, text wrapping by default would not hurt. Having to read a very long row of text when LyX In Texmacs you get at least some approximation of what is a page, for example. The feature of directly editing the preamble is extremely useful. If you are already experienced with Latex, then you learn LyX very fast. (1) Steeper learning curve compared to Word-like processors. I believe that LyX has not replaced Latex due to several reasons combined: ![]() The only thing I could wish in the future,īetter collaboration tools (see Overleaf for example). And I was very happy about this.Īlthough LyX GUI looks not very appealing at first, the software is I ended up writing my PhD thesis in LyX thanks to a fellow student I tried to find a workaround using Texmacs until it crashed a few times.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |